Uitgeverij Paris × Close
Journal of Human Trafficking, Enslavement and Conflict-Related Sexual Violence (JHEC)
2021 / 1 (Juni) 1
 
  • OPEN ACCESS
    Editorial online pdf
 
  • Conny Rijken - Tilburg University, Leyla Khadraoui - Tilburg University, Marian Tankink - Independent consultant

    (Preventing) Secondary Victimisation of Trafficking Victims through Law Enforcement Interventions online pdf
 
  • Sunneva Gilmore - School of Law, Queen’s University Belfast

    Better Late than Never: Reparations for Sexual Violence in the Ntaganda case before the International Criminal Court online pdf
 
  • Anne-Marie de Brouwer and Eefje de Volder - Impact: Center against Human Trafficking and Sexual Violence in Conflict

    International Criminal Court (ICC): Dominic Ongwen online pdf
 
  • Manouk AW van de Klundert - Tilburg University (BSc), University of Copenhagen (student)

    Sexual Terrorism and Social Stigma: How Stigma Influences the Pathway to Justice for Survivors of Boko Haram, and Potential Ways Forward online pdf

(Preventing) Secondary Victimisation of Trafficking Victims through Law Enforcement Interventions

Toon als PDF
Conny Rijken - Tilburg University, Leyla Khadraoui - Tilburg University, Marian Tankink - Independent consultant*


Secondary victimisation during criminal proceedings is a serious risk for victims of trafficking who participate in these proceedings. Psychological consequences of trafficking and pre-existing vulnerabilities make them prone to secondary victimisation. Based on empirical research among trafficking victims, stakeholders and of criminal files, the article provides insights on the psychological consequences of human trafficking and identifies a number of risk factors. These are: lack of identification, lack of safety and trust, not being believed, repetition and intensity of hearings, disrespectful treatment, lack of empathy and lack of knowledge about victim’s rights. These factors are discussed and contextualised in the current discourse with the ultimate aim to provide indications on the prevention of secondary victimisation. The article unveils the discrepancy between victims’ expectations towards the police to take them out of a trafficking situation, even if they decline assistance and police’s perceptions on their ability to intervene only if the victim accepts assistance. This leads to the call for further research in order to answer the question to intervene or not to intervene.

Inloggen


Wachtwoord vergeten?

Abonneren op dit tijdschrift

Om toegang te krijgen tot het gehele artikel heeft u een abonnement nodig. Meer informatie over de abonnementsvormen en prijzen kunt u hier vinden.

Abonneren op dit tijdschrift

Indien u een los artikel wilt bestellen, stuur een e-mail naar info@uitgeverijparis.nl