Uitgeverij Paris × Close
Review of European Administrative Law (REALaw)
2022 / 3 (October) 1
 
  • Editorial online pdf
Articles
  • Alessandro Nato - Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Department of Law, Luiss University, Valerio Bontempi - Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Department of Law, Luiss University

    The Protection of the EU’s Financial Interests and Pandemic Emergency Tools: an Analysis of the Control Mechanism between the EU and the Member States online pdf
  • Lorenzo Cecchetti - Postdoctoral Research Fellow in EU Law, Department of Law, Luiss University, Daniele Gallo - Jean Monnet Chair and Full Professor of EU Law, Department of Law, Luiss University

    The Unwritten Exceptions to the Duty to Refer After Consorzio Italian Management II: ‘CILFIT Strategy’ 2.0 and its Loopholes online pdf
Case Law Analysis
  • Xabier Arzoz - Professor of EU and Administrative Law, Jean Monnet Chair on Integration through EU Fundamental Righ

    The Legal Effects of a Serious Infringement of EU Law on Administrative Authorities and Courts: Comments on the Judgment of 10 March 2022, Case C-177/20 Grossmania, EU:C:2022:175 online pdf
Book Review
  • Paola Chirulli

    Maurizia De Bellis, I poteri ispettivi dell’amministrazione europea online pdf

The Legal Effects of a Serious Infringement of EU Law on Administrative Authorities and Courts: Comments on the Judgment of 10 March 2022, Case C-177/20 Grossmania, EU:C:2022:175

Toon als PDF
Xabier Arzoz - Professor of EU and Administrative Law, Jean Monnet Chair on Integration through EU Fundamental Righ*


The European Court of Justice’s case-law has often dealt with conflicts between the principles of legality and legal certainty in national proceedings. In the Grossmania case, the Third Chamber of the Court ruled on the obligations of national administrative authorities and courts to nullify the unlawful consequences of a manifest and serious infringement of EU law. The preliminary ruling referred to the question of whether administrative authorities and courts should withdraw or disapply administrative decisions that are manifestly and seriously contrary to EU law but have become final in the absence of a challenge before the courts. The Court answered in the affirmative, save in specific cases in which objective and legitimate obstacles can preclude such measures. Nevertheless, in those cases affected persons should be granted the right to compensation, whether financial or other; besides, the State is liable for damage caused by the breach of EU law.

Inloggen


Wachtwoord vergeten?

Abonneren op dit tijdschrift

Om toegang te krijgen tot het gehele artikel heeft u een abonnement nodig. Meer informatie over de abonnementsvormen en prijzen kunt u hier vinden.

Abonneren op dit tijdschrift

Indien u een los artikel wilt bestellen, stuur een e-mail naar info@uitgeverijparis.nl