Sacha Prechal - Judge at the Court of Justice of the EU and Honorary Professor of European Law at Utrecht University
Javier Esteban Ríos - Profesor de Derecho Administrativo, Universidad de Zaragoza
Fien Van Reempts - PhD researcher and FWO fellow (11PJ224N), University of Antwerp
Theodoros G. Iliopoulos - Postdoctoral Fellow (Fundamental Research) of the Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), visiting pro
Jacopo Alberti - Department of Law, University of Ferrara
RPA Kraaijeveld - Senior legal counsel at the Dutch Central Bank, MBJ van Rijn - Senior legal counsel at the Dutch Central Bank and Financial Law Centre, Radboud University, L Wissink - Senior manager in legal and regulatory team for financial services of an international consultancy f
Sigrid Stokstad - University of Oslo, Henrik Wenander - Lund University
Ulrich Stelkens - Professor of Public Law, German and European Administrative Law, German University of Administrative
The process of European convergence involves Union institutions and bodies occasionally applying national rules that transpose directives. This updating of the role of the EU framework has raised certain problems of articulation, which, in particular, concern the possible direct effect of the provisions contained in the transposed directives. Despite significant shortcomings, adopting a functional and goal-oriented interpretation would extend the doctrine of the direct effect of directives to the institutions and bodies of the Union, in order to prevent asymmetries and perverse incentives. However, it would be desirable for the EU legislator to explicitly clarify how to approach the most contentious issues, strengthening legal certainty and reducing reliance on interpretations that may stem from disputes before the Court of Justice.
Om toegang te krijgen tot het gehele artikel heeft u een abonnement nodig. Meer informatie over de abonnementsvormen en prijzen kunt u hier vinden.
Abonneren op dit tijdschrift