Uitgeverij Paris × Close

Review of European Administrative Law (REALaw)

2022 / 1 (April) 1
 
  • Editorial online pdf
Article
  • Wolfgang Weiss - Professor of Public Law, International and European Law, Speyer University and Senior Fellow at the German Research Institute for Public Administration

    Pandemic and Administrative EU Soft Law: Persistent Challenges to the Rule of Law in the EU and Possible Solutions online pdf
Case Law Analysis
  • Aart de Vries - PhD Candidate, Willem Pompe Institute for Criminal Sciences and Criminology and Utrecht Centre for Regulation and Enforcement in Europe (RENFORCE), Utrecht University

    Recent Developments Concerning the Right to Silence and Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Under the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU – A Critical Reflection on Case C-481/19 DB v Consob online pdf
  • Dr. Andreas Witte - European Central Bank, Frankfurt

    The Interaction Between Administrative and Judicial Review at the European Level: Notes on the Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 in Joined Cases T-351/18 and T-584/18, Ukrselhosprom PCF LLC and Versobank AS v ECB online pdf
Book Review
  • Kathrin Hamenstädt - Lecturer in Law, Brunel University

    Justine N Stefanelli, Judicial Review of Immigration Detention in the UK, USA and EU: from Principles to Practice online pdf

Recent Developments Concerning the Right to Silence and Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Under the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU – A Critical Reflection on Case C-481/19 DB v Consob

Toon als PDF
Aart de Vries - PhD Candidate, Willem Pompe Institute for Criminal Sciences and Criminology and Utrecht Centre for Regulation and Enforcement in Europe (RENFORCE), Utrecht University

In February 2021, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice gave its highly anticipated ruling in Case C-481/19 DB v Consob. In its judgement, the Court recognised that the natural person who risks self-incrimination has the right to remain silent during proceedings which can lead to the imposition of administrative penalties of a criminal nature. The Court of Justice did not adhere to its ‘own’ approach concerning the right to silence of undertakings in competition matters as established in Case C-374/87 Orkem v Commission, but aligned its judgement with the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights instead. Although Case C-481/19 DB v Consob constitutes an important ruling which provides much needed clarity on scope of the right to silence of natural persons under the Charter, some important aspects of the right to silence and self-incrimination remain unaddressed and new questions surface.

Inloggen


Wachtwoord vergeten?

Abonneren op dit tijdschrift

Om toegang te krijgen tot het gehele artikel heeft u een abonnement nodig. Meer informatie over de abonnementsvormen en prijzen kunt u hier vinden.

Abonneren op dit tijdschrift

Indien u een los artikel wilt bestellen, stuur een e-mail naar info@uitgeverijparis.nl