Uitgeverij Paris × Close
Review of European Administrative Law (REALaw)
2024 / 3-4 (december) 1
  • Luca De Lucia

    Editorial online pdf
Article
  • L. F. D. Honée - PhD candidate, Leiden Law School, the Netherlands, A. Drahmann - Associate Professor, Leiden Law School, the Netherlands

    OPEN ACCESS
    The Right to Access Public Information: A Legal Comparison between Sweden and the Netherlands online pdf
  • Guido Bellenghi - Maastricht University, Maastricht Centre for European Law (MCEL), Luca Knuth - Maastricht University and Kiel University, Maastricht Centre for European Law (MCEL) and Hermann Kantorowicz-Institute

    EU Food Law and the Politics of the Internal Market: The Challenge of Cultivated Meat online pdf
Perspectives
  • Paola Chirulli - Professor of Administrative Law, Sapienza University of Rome

    Towards a uniform system of administrative review before the Boards of Appeal: wishful thinking? The amended Article 58a of the Statute of the European Court of Justice online pdf
  • Sara Iglesias Sánchez - Profesora titular, Universidad Complutense de Madrid and member of the Instituto de Derecho Europeo y de Integración Regional (IDEIR)

    Shared Jurisdiction of EU Courts over Preliminary Rulings: One procedure. Two Courts. One Interpretation? online pdf
Case Law Analysis
  • Albert Sanchez-Graells - Professor of Economic Law, University of Bristol Law School

    Right to an Effective Remedy and to a Fair Trial: Is it Irrelevant whether a Procurement Review Body is Judicial in Character? Case C-303/22, CROSS Zlín online pdf
  • Rosario Federico - University of Bologna and Magistrate in training at the Tribunal of Bologna

    State Aid control in search of legitimacy: still a (long?) way to go. Reflections on T-486/18 RENV – Danske Slagtermestre v European Commission online pdf
Book Review
  • Lisette Mustert - Assistant Professor of Administrative Law, Utrecht University

    Research Handbook on Soft Law, M. Eliantonio, E. Korkea-aho, U. Mörth (eds.), Edward Elgar 2023, ISBN: 9781839101922, pp. 1-458. online pdf

Right to an Effective Remedy and to a Fair Trial: Is it Irrelevant whether a Procurement Review Body is Judicial in Character? Case C-303/22, CROSS Zlín

Toon als PDF
Albert Sanchez-Graells - Professor of Economic Law, University of Bristol Law School*
Keywords Effective remedy, fair trial, CROSS Zlín, public contracts

Abstract

In this case comment, I reflect on the position taken by the Court of Justice of the European Union in CROSS Zlín that, for the purposes of suspending the effectiveness of contract award decisions and preventing the conclusion of public contracts, it is irrelevant whether a procurement review body is judicial in character or not. I reiterate the call for a review of the Remedies Directive.

Inloggen


Wachtwoord vergeten?

Abonneren op dit tijdschrift

Om toegang te krijgen tot het gehele artikel heeft u een abonnement nodig. Meer informatie over de abonnementsvormen en prijzen kunt u hier vinden.

Abonneren op dit tijdschrift

Indien u een los artikel wilt bestellen, stuur een e-mail naar info@uitgeverijparis.nl