Review of European Administrative Law (REALaw)

2024 / 3-4 (december) 1

Luca De Lucia
Editorial online pdf

Article

L. F. D. Honée - PhD candidate, Leiden Law School, the Netherlands, A. Drahmann - Associate Professor, Leiden Law School, the Netherlands
OPEN ACCESS
The Right to Access Public Information: A Legal Comparison between Sweden and the Netherlands online pdf
Guido Bellenghi - Maastricht University, Maastricht Centre for European Law (MCEL), Luca Knuth - Maastricht University and Kiel University, Maastricht Centre for European Law (MCEL) and Hermann Kantorowicz-Institute
EU Food Law and the Politics of the Internal Market: The Challenge of Cultivated Meat online pdf

Perspectives

Paola Chirulli - Professor of Administrative Law, Sapienza University of Rome
Towards a uniform system of administrative review before the Boards of Appeal: wishful thinking? The amended Article 58a of the Statute of the European Court of Justice online pdf
Sara Iglesias Sánchez - Profesora titular, Universidad Complutense de Madrid and member of the Instituto de Derecho Europeo y de Integración Regional (IDEIR)
Shared Jurisdiction of EU Courts over Preliminary Rulings: One procedure. Two Courts. One Interpretation? online pdf

Case Law Analysis

Albert Sanchez-Graells - Professor of Economic Law, University of Bristol Law School
Right to an Effective Remedy and to a Fair Trial: Is it Irrelevant whether a Procurement Review Body is Judicial in Character? Case C-303/22, CROSS Zlín online pdf
Rosario Federico - University of Bologna and Magistrate in training at the Tribunal of Bologna
State Aid control in search of legitimacy: still a (long?) way to go. Reflections on T-486/18 RENV – Danske Slagtermestre v European Commission online pdf

Book Review

Lisette Mustert - Assistant Professor of Administrative Law, Utrecht University
Research Handbook on Soft Law, M. Eliantonio, E. Korkea-aho, U. Mörth (eds.), Edward Elgar 2023, ISBN: 9781839101922, pp. 1-458. online pdf

Shared Jurisdiction of EU Courts over Preliminary Rulings: One procedure. Two Courts. One Interpretation?

Sara Iglesias Sánchez - Profesora titular, Universidad Complutense de Madrid and member of the Instituto de Derecho Europeo y de Integración Regional (IDEIR)^*

Abstract

The 2024 reform of the Statute of the Court of Justice has activated for the first time in EU history Article 256(3) TFEU, granting jurisdiction to the General Court to hear and determine preliminary references in six ‘specific areas’. Together with the articulation of the allocation of cases between the two EU Courts, one question becomes now prominent: how to ensure uniform interpretation of EU Law. This brief contribution will reflect on the impact of the reform of the Statute on the EU judicial model and on the challenges of the new structure for internal decentralization of jurisdiction over preliminary rulings.

Wachtwoord vergeten?

Abonneren op dit tijdschrift

Om toegang te krijgen tot het gehele artikel heeft u een abonnement nodig. Meer informatie over de abonnementsvormen en prijzen kunt u hier vinden.

Abonneren op dit tijdschrift

Indien u een los artikel wilt bestellen, stuur een e-mail naar info@uitgeverijparis.nl